All of my previous works are indirectly embodied in drawing, and for this reason I do not use photographs or preparatory sketches. Sometimes I make a rough outline of the composition, ideas about the relationship between empty and full. It might be a sudden rupture of the boundary of the drawing within the sheet of paper, a repetition of the movement of sun-like dots, a scattering of looping lines that ‘staple’ the viewer and the paper, or schematic images of space (lakes, frameworks of buildings, smoke). The opposition of near and far, sharp and blurred. All of this forms a dictionary that I use and supplement from time to time.
The relationship between humans and the landscape forms the basis of my practice. While observing existing places I discover the story of interaction and also the desire for division and transformation. In what way one influences the other, how the space itself is able to change a person and how a person, in turn, is open to finding possibilities for existence within a defined territory. In my field work I aim for places that have ‘average’ qualities, that cannot interrupt my gaze or my artistic gesture.
Drawing was always on the periphery of my pursuits, a supplementary element that filled the spare time between field work and activities at Elektrozavod Gallery. At the gallery I focus on the dialogue between the artist and the exhibition space. Drawings are too independent. They are the carriers of their own space, and this quality demands a different type of interaction: close contact, personal discussion. I always saw drawings as a ‘ticket’ to the rest of my practice.
By drawing I can return to that state in which the relationship between the world and me had not yet formed, when I perceived art as a distant pursuit for people with special knowledge or a gift. Today, I really need this return.